Hollywood Agenda?

by Joe Thorn on April 29, 2005

Kelly Boggs has written another critique of American culture that has me thinking. In his recent article he explains that he used to believe Hollywood was driven by money, and that was why they made "violent and vulgar" movies. People want to see those movies. But as recent studies have shown, the top box office hits are often rated PG. He writes,

According to a variety of sources that track movie performance, PG films grossed more at the box office than did R-rated titles in 2004. In fact, five of the top-10 moneymakers were PG flicks. Out of the top 25 movies of last year, only four carried R
ratings.
(Read article at BP News)

He is now convinced that the reason the film industry continues to make "filth-filled flicks" that might not make as much money as the kid-friendly fare is because of an "agenda."

Now we know the real reason the movie industry eschews family friendly films for movies steeped in sexuality, brutality and obscenity. The driving force for too many directors is an agenda that not only calls into question, but also undermines traditional morality.

Yep, Boggs says there is an agenda (though he never tells us what that agenda is!) that undermines traditional values. These directors aren’t driven by profit, but by some malevolent cause. A plan to chip away at traditional morality. He argues that this is seen in movie makers objection to new technology that would allow viewers to edit words and content out of films. I would like to respond in three ways.

1. The "movie industry" is made up of business men who are seeking to make a profit, and artists who desire to make something worth consideration. Yes there is overlap, but I am speaking in generalities. A peek into this can be seen in the most recent season of Project Greenlight. In this reality series chronicling the making of a genre-film the studio heads are pushing for a movie that will make money, but the writers and director want to make something fun and thrilling. My point here is that when we talk about the "movie industry" it is easy to demonize the whole, imagining it to be some big, evil machine out to destroy all that is holy and good. It’s very easy if you don’t really know much about the film industry. But we’re talking about artists and businessmen here. People.

2.  Research does show that the top grossing movies are often kid friendly. Despite this film makers continue to produce R rated films that are harder, darker, uglier, or more offensive in content. Why? If you ask them, read their interviews or listen to the commentary tracks on DVDs they explain why the make what they make. The goal (agenda?) is to make something worth watching, something beautiful, or real, telling or fun – like all artists they are attempting to  elicit feeling and thought from a viewer. But what really bothers me is that Boggs is essentially accusing his neighbor of some hidden agenda. It is more likely to me that the objectionable art some make simply reflects their own values – or lack thereof – and is not an attempt to undermine "family values." Wouldn’t the art, if not about money, be more about the artist’s pain, joy, hopes, dreams, beliefs, etc. This doesn’t make sin okay, or poor art good. I am not excusing the excesses or sin in the world, but neither can I excuse the unjust judgment a Christian makes against our neighbors.

3. Yeah, the artists don’t want people editing their art. No kidding. Neither would I!  I’ll agree with Boggs that much of what Hollywood puts out is unfit for our kids. Some of it is unfit for anyone. But I think the whole idea of asking artists to edit their films so our kids can watch them is curious. Why is pop-culture so important to someone who is clearly at odds with it? If you want the film-industry to make more family-friendly movies, find ways of encouraging that. But is it critical that your children watch Friday Night Lights? Look, if the art is inappropriate, don’t allow your children to watch it. Some movies may be inappropriate to watch, and some may only be appropriate for more mature audiences. The answer is not cleaning up a "dirty" movie, but in  choosing more suitable entertainment and creating different films.

I believe Boggs has once again ably misunderstood his culture, and is addressing a symptom instead of the disease. The diagnosis is wrong, and no remedy is prescribed.

For help in choosing movies that are safe for your family to watch try using tools like ScreenIt.Com. Chris Keenon has created a blog that looks deeper into pop-culture’s art from a Christian perspective, and he has some good thoughts for adults to consider.

  • http://www.stevekmccoy.com Steve McCoy

    Good response Joe. I’ve linked to it.

  • Chris W

    Alarmist rhetoric like this by Boggs bugs me beyond belief. In addition to your comments, I have to ask: Does Boggs forget the societal/cultural/political/religious problems the Church has survived over the past 20 centuries? I don’t so much object to Boggs’ objection of movie content, but it’s the alarmist language that implies or sometimes outright states that good Christian values will completely disappear if we don’t do something about these…movies. And as for the “agenda,” I think sometimes we allow our willingness as Christians to stand up to persecution to morph into a vague paranoia.

    Between the liberal black helicopter paranoia that government secretly monitoring everything we do and the Christian paranoia that everything contrary to Scripture is part of an over-arching agenda, it’s no wonder that Americans live in a society that is increasingly withdrawn and suspicious.

  • Chris W

    Oh, I should clarify, I’m kinda lumping together my reaction to a few things I’ve recently read.
    Boggs himself makes no claim that Christian values will disappear in the article Joe references.

    I recently received a fundraiser letter from Focus on the Family, and Dobson’s language (also citing the Hollywood agenda) speaks of the danger to Christian values.

    My point being, Christian values won’t change. They are Christian as long as they are based on what we’ve learned from Christ. What I’ve learned from Christ isn’t going to change because Tim Robbins is making TV to defend “Million Dollar Baby,” or because there’s some bad language and sexual content in “Friday Night Lights.”

  • http://www.xanga.com/wantedtobethebigsurprise Vicki

    Okay- Offical new family blog: http://www.chapmanfamilyblog.blogspot.com

    Feel free to show it to whomever you like.

  • http://www.spiritualdiablog.blogspot.com Paul M. Martin

    Joe, I agree with you, having been an elementary school counselor for most of my 23 years in the public schools, that the media negatively impacts kids. I especially noticed the effects of violent imagery, very much including video games, on at-risk boys. They seemed to have trouble distiguishing what went on in the images they were seeing from the negative effects of violence as a solution to problems in real life.

    Thanks for your commment to my blog, which was useful in further clarifying some of the historical matters surrounding the writing of the New Testament. I ended up using it as the basis for my May 1 post, and have linked to your blog.

  • http://chriskeenon.typepad.com Chris K

    I feel I need to add to what Joe has said about art that reflects the artist’s feelings or tries to represent the way the artist sees the world. I talk about this in my blog about the movie “Sin City”. I don’t think that the creators of that movie promote acting out in the violent way their characters do. I think that they are presenting this as their take on the world around them. Does their view differ from ours? Yes! Because they have a different worldview than we do.
    I think we misinterpret the motivations of artists who are sharing their view of the world with us, because as Christians we want to change people’s minds to our way of thinking and think that anyone who shares their thoughts is doing likewise, when they are merely saying this is what I think or this is how I see the world. I mean how do we process things like the war in Iraq and the terror of 9/11, or deal with the reality of scientific discoveries that don’t fit easily into our moral system. There is no 11th commandment that says “Thou shalt not clone.” Of course we want to hear sermons about such things. We listen to and read the news. But we also discuss them in art and the art of our time, like it or not, is film and popular music and TV.
    Would I recommend that children see a movie like “Sin City” or even “The Shawshank Redemption”? Absolutely not. But I would also refrain from teaching a children’s Sunday school lesson on certain passages from Genesis or other parts of the Bible. Most kids know the story of Noah. In fact some dear friends of mine have decorated their twins’ nursery with cute little animals and arks. But I think it will be a little while before they hear the end of the Noah story when Noah passes out drunk and naked and then curses out his son. I also don’t think we should do a flannelgraph of the situation where the sons of Jacob avenge the rape of one of their sisters by tricking the rapists into getting circumcised and killing them when they are to debilitated from the procedure to defend themselves.
    These are just two samples of the many violent stories that occur in the Bible. Is the Bible promoting violence? No. We know that the Bible teaches meekness and gentleness as virtues, but it doesn’t gloss over reality. We live in a violent world and the Bible reflects that. And if our art is true to reality it may also contain violence. Should we enjoy it or show it to our children? No, but I think that we should be able to deal with it in a thoughtful, biblical manner.

  • Chris W

    Chris, man, great comments!! Thanks!

Previous post:

Next post: