<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God is the Gospel Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joethorn.net/2005/09/28/god-is-the-gospel-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joethorn.net/2005/09/28/god-is-the-gospel-2/</link>
	<description>theology. church. culture. life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: She Lives</title>
		<link>http://www.joethorn.net/2005/09/28/god-is-the-gospel-2/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>She Lives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethorn.net/?p=213#comment-942</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;She Reads&lt;/strong&gt;

Okay, one last post, then I&#039;m outta here for real this time . . . It seems everyone&#039;s talking about God is the Gospel by John Piper. To date, I&#039;ve thought very highly of Piper&#039;s writings.. I&#039;ve never heard him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>She Reads</strong></p>
<p>Okay, one last post, then I&#8217;m outta here for real this time . . . It seems everyone&#8217;s talking about God is the Gospel by John Piper. To date, I&#8217;ve thought very highly of Piper&#8217;s writings.. I&#8217;ve never heard him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Thorn</title>
		<link>http://www.joethorn.net/2005/09/28/god-is-the-gospel-2/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Thorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethorn.net/?p=213#comment-941</guid>
		<description>Jeremy P.,

I classified the reviews simplistically to summarize, and I chose those four to give balance. Two came off (to me) as more negative, and two came off positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy P.,</p>
<p>I classified the reviews simplistically to summarize, and I chose those four to give balance. Two came off (to me) as more negative, and two came off positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.joethorn.net/2005/09/28/god-is-the-gospel-2/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethorn.net/?p=213#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Wink said the first three chapters drove him to worship. I wouldn&#039;t have described that as a negative review. Adrian Warnock actually called it a positive review, but I disagree with him too. It simply makes one positive statement and two negative statements, and it spends a similar enough amount of time on each of the three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wink said the first three chapters drove him to worship. I wouldn&#8217;t have described that as a negative review. Adrian Warnock actually called it a positive review, but I disagree with him too. It simply makes one positive statement and two negative statements, and it spends a similar enough amount of time on each of the three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.joethorn.net/2005/09/28/god-is-the-gospel-2/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethorn.net/?p=213#comment-939</guid>
		<description>Joe,
I liked the book too.  I read a couple of reviews by people who said it was a waste of time to read, but I for one did not understand their arguments.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,<br />
I liked the book too.  I read a couple of reviews by people who said it was a waste of time to read, but I for one did not understand their arguments.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

