The Jerks

by Joe Thorn on October 24, 2005

During many of the historic revivals that took place on this continent some pretty weird things accompanied the work of God during the meetings. One such thing was “the jerks.” This was the rapid, involuntary movement of a listener’s head and/or limbs. I have often wondered if “the jerks” would appear in my lifetime, and they have. In fact, I’m pretty sure they never went away. I seem to find some jerks in just about every corner of Christianity I look; especially on the internet.

One particular manifestation that has been bothering me culminates in an expression I have heard more times than I can recall. I have heard this a lot because some Calvinists are prone to use it, many fundamentalists seem to live by it, and because I used to say it more than anyone I know.

The expression? “My attitude is irrelevant; it’s what I am saying that matters.”

My guess is you’ve either heard it or said it. You know how it goes; someone is arrogant, abrasive, or speaks condescendingly, and when challenged on this point the response is often, “Yeah I am caustic, proud and arrogant. So what? That doesn’t change what I am saying! You need to stay on topic.” In fact, such people often marvel that no one listens to them outside of their camp.

Some are probably bristling at where I am going. But the bottom line is that our attitude does matter. Our character has an impact on the trustworthiness of our words. One man recently admitted on his blog that he is arrogant and caustic, but that these things do not change the facts of which he writes. Of course he’s right on that last point. But his attitude does challenge the integrity of his message.

your message appears dubious when your attitude is so unlike the God you claim to speak of and forLook, being right is not an excuse for being a jerk. Pride and arrogance (things God hates) damage your reputation and you lose credibility. In other words, your message appears dubious when your attitude is so unlike the God you claim to speak of and for. The end result is not only that you fail to win an argument or change someone’s mind, but that you undermine the the very truth you love so much. You may be the undoing of your own point.

I agree that ad hominem arguments are usually not worth rebuttal, and detract from the issue under consideration. But for those whose attitudes are at odds with the truth or God they speak of, change (repentance) is necessary.

  • http://thejaggededge.blogspot.com Mark

    Joe-
    Thank you for this article. Every now and then I have to remind myself to be humble and compassionate. Mostly, my wife reminds me to be compassionate. It’s a word I’m learning in practice every day.
    Take care!

    Mark

  • http://www.ryandebarr.com/blog Ryan DeBarr

    God = truth & God = love

    truth = God = love

    truth = love

    love = truth

    no love = no truth

  • http://www.doneydepot.blogspot.com Marcguyver

    I must say that there are times when we as humans do need to in fact look beyond ‘how’ a person is saying something and allow them to ‘vent’ and hear the actual words of what they are saying.

    However, I would have to agree, that generally speaking we need to realize the importance of how we interact with others so that we do in fact model the risen Christ as we are commanded to do. Course, it’s a bit easier said than done for me.

    Good topic man.

  • http://justtodd.snowhill.org Todd

    precisely my contention regarding the sbc

  • Travis

    Well, there you go again, Todd. Pointing the finger at everyone else (with a huge generality). Give it up, man.

  • http://blog.lukenine45.net db smith

    Thanks for a great post.

  • http://greensoylent.blogspot.com TheBlueRaja

    Thanks, Joe. It’s funny how somewhere along the lines love gets translated into being right — the most loving thing you could do is speak the truth, therefore if I’m speaking the truth I’m being loving. In that line of thinking, speaking the truth IN love becomes a stylistic redundancy. Truth IS love, and vice versa. In any case, I think being Christians should mean, minimally, that we’re not a buncha jerks. Thanks again for the reminder.

  • http://rev-ed.blogspot.com rev-ed

    Sometimes, I’m conviced we argue to win the argument instead of arguing to win the soul.

    Good post, Joe.

  • http://www.joethorn.net Joe Thorn

    Thanks guys. I am still unpacking at the new place, but here is an email I received from a friend who wishes to remain anonymous. He writes as a committed and involved Southern Baptist.

    Joe, you are dead on. I’d venture to say that what you describe is a foundational element of the legalism that permeates Christianity and our denomination. People are so sure they speak for God that they miss that the essence of Jesus’ authority came in his humility. He was so completely right that he didn’t have to be arrogant but could be gracious and humble and bring people to knowledge through consistency in action that affirmed His verbal authority. In other words he was secure in his leadership and was not threatened by a divergence of opinion because he was Truth. Sure wish some of the preacher boys across our denomination would take a page from Jesus’ book (literally and figuratively) and let their authority be a by-product of their humble assurance and not from who is BP approved and can shout the loudest above the religious din!

  • http://www.stevekmccoy.com/ Steve McCoy

    Ohhh, nice. Maybe the mystery man/woman needs to start blogging (if he/she isn’t already). Good thoughts.

  • http://alexforrest.blogspot.com Alex

    Steve has a discussion on apologetics on his blog (as I’m sure you know) that talks about 1 Peter 3:15. We are so quick to tell people to prepared with their arguments…. but often we don’t read the rest of the verse: “…but do this with gentleness and respect.”

  • http://www.doneydepot.blogspot.com Marcguyver

    For God is opposed to the proud and gives grace to the humble. Therefore, humble yourselves under the mighty hand of God that he may exalt you at the proper time.

    I sure like rev-ed’s statement; I think I’m completely guilty of this at times!

Previous post:

Next post: