Redeemer Orientation

by Joe Thorn on February 3, 2009

This past Saturday I led a group of people through our first membership class (Redeemer Orientation) and I thought I’d share a little about why we have membership, why we continue to use the language of “membership,” and how the class is structured.

We do church “membership” because we believe it is a healthy way for us to practice what the Bible teaches should be true of a local church. Specifically, formal membership enables us to function as a covenant community characterized by a unified faith, work and discipline. Apart from membership we find that these things are more difficult to maintain.

And yes, we use the term “membership.” Some of my friends opt for the term “partnership” instead, believing it has less baggage than “membership.” While I don’t agree with that assessment, I don’t think it’s a big deal. We use the term membership for two reasons.

1. The term is biblical (Rom 12; 1 Cor 12; Eph 2:19, 3:6, 4:25, 5:30).
Call me nutty, but I like using biblical terms whenever I can. But to be fair, I don’t think we have to use the word. Jesus chose not to use the word “Messiah” for himself because of the confusion that was likely to result (there was a lot of cultural/theological baggage attached to that title). He preferred “Son of Man.” Concerning joining a church – we just don’t believe people who may be averse to the idea of “membership” are comforted or fooled by calling it partnership. Either way people have to join. But if “partnership” works better for another church – that’s cool with me. Whatever we call it, the important thing is to practice it well and lead people toward a healthy understanding of life as the church.

2. The concept is biblical.
The Bible demonstrates that the church is analogous to many things; the church is likened to a building (1 Cor. 3:9, Eph. 2:21, 2 Cor. 6:16), a body (Rom. 12:4-5, Heb. 12), a flock (1 Peter 5:2), and a family (1 Tim. 3:15. Eph. 1:5). At Redeemer we really favor the idea of church as family – which is another reason we maintain the word “member.” I am a member of my family. And when a person joins The Redeemer family, it is less a business partnership, and more of an adoption, or marriage, as we all become members of one household. The family metaphor and membership work against the practice church shopping, and even idea of favoring a church as one might favor a particular Starbucks location because of a particular barista or blend of coffee.

Participating in the Redeemer Orientation is not a promise to seek membership with us, nor is completing the class a guarantee of membership status, but it is a prerequisite for all who seek membership. Our class consists of 3 sessions that happen in one day over the span of 3 hours. That is much shorter than some church’s membership process, and a bit longer than others. For us this seems like a good fit. People have been asking for an outline of what we cover so here it is. Just the bullet points, obviously there is much more detail in the class.

Redeemer Orientation

Part 1: The Gospel (The Heart of Our Church).

A. The Gospel

1. The gospel is historical (1 Cor. 15:3-7).
The life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

2. The gospel is theological.
The gospel is the good news that through the cross of Jesus Christ we have the forgiveness of our sins, and the redemption and restoration of all things.

a) Forgiveness, peace with God (Eph. 1:7)

b) Restoration of all things (Col. 1:19, 20)

B. The Gospel and You

1. Conversion: Faith and Repentance (Mk. 1:15)

2. Your identity in Christ (Gal. 2:20)

C. The Gospel and Others

1. A Redeemed Community (1 Peter 2)

2. The church as family (1 Tim. 3:15. Eph. 1:5.)

Part 2: The Church (The Shape of our Church).

A. What is a local church?

1. Defined

A local church is a covenant-community of Christ followers where:
The word is rightly preached.
The sacraments are rightly administered.
The mission of God is shared.
The leadership is biblically formed and functioning.
The discipline of members is practiced with grace.

2. A healthy church.

3. Healthy church members.

B. Church Distinctives

1. Confessional.
A confessional church is a church that is essentially united around a clearly articulated faith. We believe that it is the truth of God that gives birth to the people of God and compels them to move forward on the mission of God.

Confessionally, we are Reformed and baptistic.

2. Missional.
A missional church is one that recognizes itself as God’s missionary people to those they live among. This means we do not see ourselves merely as those who send missionaries to other countries, but as missionaries ourselves to a unique time and place (the greater Fox Valley area in the far west suburbs of Chicago in the third millennium). As a missional church we are looking for ways to serve our community with the gospel in word and deed and are seeking to be an active part of God’s redemptive work here in our city.

3. Relational.
A relational church is one that sees itself not as a distributor of religious goods and services, but as covenant community, a family, who share their lives, practice hospitality, and live out the missional nature of the church not as individuals but as a peculiar people. It means that relationships are valuable to us, and we strive to develop them both inside and outside of the church.

Part 3: The Mission (The Movement of our Church).

A. Our purpose statement.
“to love and serve God and others”

The captures our movement in summary form. It is the essence of God’s law, as well as the proper response to the gospel.

B. Our Paradigm. “The table, the pulpit, and the square.”

This is whiteboard time and when we show visually how all the parts of Redeemer are designed to work together. I’ve blogged on this in the past, but we have tweaked it since then and I may blog on it in the near future.

I have really benefited from reading through other church membership practices. Feel free to share what you do, and have found helpful or problematic concerning membership in the comments.

  • Nat

    I’m curious. At Redeemer, what is your membership process? Are members voted on by the church? Is it a saved, baptized church membership? Also, are you using the terms sacraments and ordinances interchangeably when it comes to baptism and communion? Also, I think I remember reading a while back that Redeemer is part of the SBC? Would you consider your church Baptist then or baptistic? How does the SBC view your status?

    At our church (regular Baptist) our prospective members no longer go through a class–unless they are new believers. We also offer a class once a year for people who attend but are not members. However, they do meet with the pastor(s) and then with the deacons and share their testimony as well as answer any questions that they may have.

    Baptism is also a requirement at our church (primarily, from what I gather based on many of the conversions in Acts and a few writings of Paul in Romans 6.)

    Based on their testimony, the deacons then make a recommendation to the church and the church votes on it.

    • http://www.joethorn.net Joe Thorn

      Nat,

      To be admitted to membership a person must:

      1. Be a follower of Christ
      2. Be baptized by immersion as a believer (not necessarily via Redeemer)
      3. Complete the Redeemer Orientation
      4. Meet with an Elder in which we discuss a number of things including their faith in Christ, the church covenant, and answer any questions they may have.

      Members are received by the church at one of our quarterly member’s meetings upon the recommendation of the elders.

      We use both terms; sacrament and ordinance.

      We are definitely baptists, but often use the term “baptistic” to simply help make a distinction between baptist theology (which we embrace) and much of the 20th century baptist culture (which we do not). For example, we believe that only believers should be baptized, and that by immersion. But we are not teetotalers. We have much more in common with the baptist culture of the 17th, and 18th centuries than that baptist cultures some of our churched members have encountered. It’s a rather subjective use of the words, but we’re just trying to help people see who we are.

  • http://www.vellezerit-shkoder.com 68guns

    Thanks Joe!

    I realise some of the points would be expanded upon over the course of the teaching sessions.

    We would emphasise the need for submission to the leadership.
    The fact that from day one, they understand the authority and role of the leaders, and accept their submission to them and decisions they make is always a good reference point, should any problems occur in the future.

    I would probably change the part…
    “The discipline of members is practiced with grace.”
    To…
    “The discipline of members is practiced with grace but also in truth.”
    By this I mean that no problem will be swept under the carpet or ignored( in truth), yet any discipline will be with the view to repentance, full forgiveness and complete restoration of the member. (in grace)

    • http://www.joethorn.net Joe Thorn

      We cover submission to leadership when we go over healthy church members and the church covenant.

      We certainly make the “truth” part clear in that discussion, but it’s a good idea to put it in the bullet point as “Truth and grace.” Thanks for pointing that out!

  • http://www.relentlessgrace.wordpress.com Robbie Schmidtberger

    Excellent recap. Thanks for sharing. I love the balance and forwardness about being confessional and missional. Your notes on membership are good. Definitely will “chew” on them.

  • Nat

    @Joe

    Thanks for answering. You’re process is not all that different from ours, although (and I like your wording on this part) we do hold a little closer to the 20th century way of doing things. However, that is always evolving. Drinking alcoholic beverages is not just the issue, there are a few others (movies, smoking–especially cigars, music, etc.).

    I don’t smoke or drink, but that it based out of my own personal health not a biblical mandate or oppressed tradition. I know we have church members that do one or the other, but I don’t judge them for it. It’s not my place to judge. (It is my place to intervene if it causes harm to the church, but that is an entirely different discussion about the responsibilities of the pastor) However, I enjoy going to a movie from time to time and I listen to all sorts of music.

    We don’t enforce any of those or even have them “forbidden” in our covenant. However, and this is always the big issue, many people are traditionalist when it comes to such matters (Which is scary because it adheres close to another denomination that values tradition over biblical authority. Boy, don’t ever bring that up in Baptist circles!)

    • http://www.joethorn.net Joe Thorn

      I figured you like movies, and one in particular based on your email addy. :) Am I right?

  • Nat

    Actually I’ve always used that email. Something I came up with as a kid reading Hardy Boys books.

    However, I’ve had a couple of people try and make a connection to Blue Streak. Was that what you were thinking of? I’ve also had a connection to Reservoir Dogs but I don’t think there is a “gray” in that. (I don’t remember, I’m not a big Tarantino fan.)

    • http://www.joethorn.net Joe Thorn

      No “agents” in Reservoir Dogs, and no “Mr. Gray” either. But I was thinking about this.

  • Nat

    Haha. First movie, yes, more please. Second and third, not so much. You are the first to make that type of connection.

  • Pingback: why church membership « Interstitial

Previous post:

Next post: