Post image for The Elephant Room 2

The Elephant Room 2

by Joe Thorn on January 23, 2012

This Wednesday I’m pumped to join some friends at The Elephant Room. As a believer in debates (I wish the church would do more of them today), I dig the idea of leaders hashing out differences in public. This year is more controversial than the first ER as one of the participants, T.D. Jakes, has long been associated with Oneness Pentecostalism which denies the doctrine of the Trinity. I haven’t read or listened to much by T.D. Jakes, though what I have read is certainly not orthodox trinitarian theology. For more you can read his article in Christianity Today, “What I Believe About the Godhead.”

I understand why some people are concerned (and a few are freaking out) about Jakes’ invitation to this gathering, but I am looking forward to a dialog about this critical doctrine, as well as the other conversations. The church needs to do a better job talking to one another, than just about one another. And when talking to one another we need to be willing to say directly that something another advocates is unwise, wrong, dangerous, or even heretical. I will be posting my thoughts on how it all goes down after the event.

  • Suzanne Evans

    Many will be watching how this goes. An opportunity to model what you believe about confronting differences rather than tiptoeing around them. When we shun a “brother” whose beliefs are off-kilter, we put him in such isolation he succeeds in creating his own universe with its own possibly heretical truth standards and his own sea of trusting followers. I will be praying for you and your undaunted elephant room fellows.

  • Dan Tsouloufis

    I agree it’s important “how” we communicate our views.  As Christians, we need to be direct and firm but not make it personal.  The point isn’t to demonize but to speak the truth in love, even blunt love if needed.  If we get the doctrine of the Trinity wrong, then our theology starts going down hill from there, since there are just so many implications. Healthy debate is good.

Previous post:

Next post: